You need to turn on Javascript in your browser to use this site!

The art of organisational collaboration | Nomensa

Part Five – The Art of Collaboration

Posted on

10 minutes, 54 seconds
Part Five – The Art of Collaboration

What does collaboration mean to you? Has it changed since you began reading the Art of Collaboration? When I first started ruminating over the idea that would become this series, I liked to work from the definition I stated in part one, where collaboration meant: “the action of working with someone to produce something.” The bones of this haven’t changed, but it’s really much more than that.

Yet, thanks to its frequently touted status in boardrooms and across managerial structures, collaboration could still seem more like a buzzword than a revolutionary component in your commercial strategy. We may take for granted that collaboration is just naturally what we do, so why even think about it?

However, in the process of analysing the mechanics of ‘collaboration’, we realise that far from it being a simple matter of people working together, there’s a broader psychology occurring here. When we collaborate, something new emerges as the idea passes through each of our minds and collects experiences and insights along the way. Collaboration isn’t just a method for working, it’s a way of being, behaving and interacting with the world.

And it’s important we pay attention to the words we use. Far from being static beads that fit neatly into a string of sentences, language is flexible. It contorts and changes depending on its context. Similar to the atoms that wed together to make molecules, what’s intrinsic doesn’t change, but the way that they are structured alters their expression.

Collaboration isn’t just a method for working, it’s a way of being, behaving and interacting with the world. – Simon Norris

The cascading levels of collaboration

Alongside collaboration’s ambiguity comes two more surprisingly confounding words: capacity and capability. Now, you wouldn’t be remiss to occasionally use them interchangeably, but when taken out of their colloquial context, these two words take on drastically different meanings.

Capacity becomes the sum of an individual’s output, both predicted and actualised. Meanwhile, capability refers to the systems, processes and frameworks that underpin an organisation’s design efforts. Collaboration then is both a golden thread that interacts with every level of design and a key performance metric. Our collaborative capacity builds our capability, which in turn enhances our customer experiences.

This level of linguistic attention may seem pedantic but being precise grants us both intention and clear direction. And what I’m talking about here is a business or design language. I don’t mean that we should go back to hiding behind industry jargon, but rather by establishing shared meanings, we can maintain the group’s cohesion and consistency as it scales and gathers more members.

This commonality in expression also carries a commitment from leadership teams. Most people are just waiting for permission. And so good leaders are those who embody that same collaborative spirit of curiosity and transparency, whilst providing their staff opportunities to do the same. They plus ideas, encourage learning and foster a feeling of psychological safety. This foundation of trust helps to generate fresh ideas and novel solutions because everyone is free to bring their best self, and best thinking to the table.

Illustration showing 'The Golden Thread' - description in article

Figure 1: The Golden Thread. The orchestration of activities across a whole design lifecycle (and beyond), starts before diamond zero.

Collaboration can be the lingua franca when designing for products or services that span the globe, or if you’re in a project team spread across various locations and organisations. And it works just as well if it’s just you and another human toiling away. It requires less ‘I’ and more ‘us’, and in this sense can be considered an egoless activity that shows we’re all on the same team, working to the same goals. And when done well, this team also extends to and includes the customer (but that’s an article for another day).

Great teams make great products

Excellent leaders will nurture the T-shaped individuals in their teams, who in time, will then upskill their co-workers and build capability. Get enough T-shaped people scattered across a business and you’re rewarded with an organisation that is fundamentally more designerly and efficient. But more importantly, this type of outlook cultivates a real feeling of being in it together and creates a shared perspective.

The greatest products and services are not necessarily produced by simply gathering all the most brilliant minds in a specific area. But rather, they are created by teams who are united by shared aims, autonomy, and a genuine commitment to work towards the proverbial ‘common good’.

What makes these teams so much more effective than the ‘work groups’ cited in Google’s Project Aristotle, is that they are egalitarian in the truest sense. Everyone has a stake, and everyone makes a contribution. This team effort results in a gestalt effect where people’s actions are augmented – better work, and ultimately outcomes are realised.

We can’t treat collaboration like we’re on Ford’s assembly line. It’s not factory mentality, driven by the capitalistic need to specialise and create efficiencies and economies of scale. It’s about allowing social capital to emerge and flourish.

Collaboration is creative. This is what Read highlights as lacking within the pencil analogy. That is, people were unaware of their contribution to the whole. This means, if we want people to collaborate and understand the importance of collaboration, we have to encourage them to see the bigger picture. It is more than what a single person does, but rather what they do with other people. We have to encourage the gestalt perspective, seeing the bigger picture, and this is the heart of collaborative thinking and action.

Mastering the bigger picture

Let’s go back to our faithful orchestra metaphor, as we know by now that collaboration requires orchestration. Every player in the orchestra must be able to read music and play in-time. And they need to have those skills in abundance. To achieve such abundance requires relentless dedication and constant practice. The same is true for collaboration.

Collaboration requires us to think and practice the skills we need to perform to complete our duties well, as well as, all the skills we need to help our teammates do the same. By helping, complementing and augmenting the people around us, we strengthen teams and encourage a supermind approach.

What’s crucial back in the studio isn’t necessarily knowing the minutia of each stage in development, but rather how we situate our skills in the context of the project’s commercial goals. This isn’t just a matter of KPIs and driving up conversions in the checkout. Tapping into the ‘why’ requires shifting your perspective and mastering that tricky bigger picture. But once we’ve grappled with the strategic framing of the first diamond, we can then turn to perfecting our own skills within the project’s choreography.

Creating a team of collaborators

What one individual lacks, the wider team provides. Just like our ancient ancestors, we’re able to go further by going together. But this doesn’t mean minimising the individual into a homogenous mass with neither distinction nor autonomous thought. Instead, my philosophy of collaboration is one that throws the door open. It invites everyone in.

Every collaboration manifests differently. And it’s in the unique augmentation of those skills that we find the long-awaited diversity in thought so essential for ground-breaking design. Gestalt isn’t only about the sum of the parts. It is the parts. And the relationships between the parts, as well!

The British writer Alan Watts famously said, “Every individual is a unique manifestation of the whole, as every branch is a particular outreaching of the tree.” Watts is stating the interconnectivity of everything, we included. We are all part of the tree and the tree is part of the world. This shows us that collaboration is an activity with potentially unlimited capacity that we can tap into and benefit from, as individuals and teams and whole organisations.

So, how do you tap into your collaborative capacity? If you’re unsure of where to start, you can find a list of questions over in part three that should begin to knock loose some of the ideal attributes we see in T-shaped individuals.

Abstract illustration showing a person's head in pink and blue tones, with a 'Golden Thread' running through the middle - description in article

Figure 2: The Golden Thread. Combining people, the activities they complete, so there is connection and alignment. Allows people to focus on their purpose and to see the bigger picture their effort and activities fit into.

Collaboration underpins success

But it’s not all about singing our own praises. We must recognise the limitations in our own characters, as well as where our skills may be lacking. By mapping out our skills and not-so-specialisms, we can define ourselves instead of relying on someone else to tell us who or what we are.

It’s an empowering act that enables us to both celebrate how far we’ve come while acknowledging when we need to call on our teammates to help us to take our next step. This kind of work is rooted in self-awareness and honest reflection. But like an architect arranging the features that will one day become a cathedral, by starting small, we can then expand our perspective to see the totality of an experience.

And just as a cathedral cannot be reduced to a single attribute, an organisation is often never defined by a single product or service. Everything we design, write or build contributes to internal culture, and how we are perceived by the world and our customers.

And to consistently and effectively craft brilliant customer experiences, we need frameworks. Just as scaffolding is required to build buildings and alter them, frameworks can fulfil a similar function when we are building digital products and services. They frame the patterns that shape the design.

Collaboration is the focus

Collaboration allows us to organise at scale. It establishes a common language, with common goals and path forward. This unity in both practicalities and strategy pose a clear advantage when we are designing complex products and services that can span multiple teams, locations and organisations. Essentially, collaboration allows us to address such complexities through shared action and understanding. Such complexities are likely to increase as our interactions become increasingly convoluted.

Collaboration then is act of design that helps us to address complexity. We work best together when we know our roles and responsibilities (business management), and where those skills overlap or may be missing (design management). When our various disciplines and areas of expertise are combined, we attain the prize of Gestalt.

And there is nothing better to illustrate this than the majesty of a cathedral – at one level it is merely just a building, yet at another level it also represents something so much more! When we look with collaborative eyes we see more clearly the bigger picture, the details, and the relationships between the big and the small. We see the wonder, not just in what we do, or what others do, but what we can become and achieve, together.

Turning advice into action

It is my hope that, like Buckminster Fuller once wrote, this series will “give [you] a tool, the use of which will lead to new ways of thinking.” The suggested frameworks and checklists enclosed should get you started, but the next step in this collaboration is up to you.

This is not the end of the collaboration series, but the beginning, a foundation on which we can layer with future articles that illustrate the importance and power of collaboration.

I will leave you with this final idea. Collaboration is not an alternative to specialisation, it is the argument of specialisation that results in greater cognitive diversity – this is how we can embrace and benefit from gestalt perspective. Because everything matters, it always has, and always will. And the only way to truly appreciate that everything matters is to understand that it cannot be achieved by one, but rather, many.

So, in the twenty first century modern collaboration represents a positive way forward. But we also have another trick up our sleeve for taking your digital estate leaps beyond your competition: the Experience Assessment and its twin tool, the Accessibility Assessment.

When partnered with the EA, the AA provides a comprehensive analysis of your current digital offering. And it spies chances to extend your reach to millions of potential customers you may otherwise lock out. They are free, and take around fifteen minutes to complete and in return, you’ll gain analysis, that shows capability gaps and opportunities, that can act as vital inputs for building a roadmap for a more inclusive future, a future focused on delivering excellent customer experience.

As always, you can find our friendly team of customer experience experts ready to help you take your next steps towards collaborative excellence. Get in touch today.


The series:

Part One: The art of collaboration

Part Two: Becoming a more collaborative individual

Part Three: Becoming a more collaborative team

Part Four: Becoming a more collaborative organisation

Part Five: The art of collaboration

Related posts

  1. Mission vs Vision


    Mission vs Vision

    What’s the difference between mission and vision? In this blog, we’ll explain why you need to understand them if you want to achieve a strategic experience mindset and meet your business goals.

We'd love to hear from you

We drive commercial value for our clients by creating experiences that engage and delight the people they touch.

Email us:

Call us:
+44 (0) 117 929 7333

Please update your browser to view this site!